25 de enero de 2012 | 00:45:00 | Washington Post - Politics
A State of the Union address is often difficult to fact-check, no matter who is president. The speech is a product of many hands and is carefully vetted, so major errors of fact are so relatively rare that they sometimes can become big news (think of George W. Bush’s “sixteen little words” about Iraq seeking uranium in Niger). At the same time, State of the Union addresses are very political speeches, an argument for the president’s policies, so context (or the perspective of opponents) is often missing.
Read full article >>
Leer más y comentar: Fact-checking the 2012 State of the Union speech »
Artículos recientes de Washington Post - Politics
08 de febrero de 2012
08 de febrero de 2012
08 de febrero de 2012
08 de febrero de 2012
08 de febrero de 2012
08 de febrero de 2012
07 de febrero de 2012
07 de febrero de 2012
07 de febrero de 2012
07 de febrero de 2012
Mas artículos de Washington Post - Politics
Guatemala, jueves 09 de febrero de 2012 | 06:41:41 